[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.13982066 [View]
File: 882 KB, 1417x1890, 20190914_210124.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13982066

>>13980485
Cringe, this is your brain on coom. Don't listen to this horeshit OP

>> No.13865670 [View]
File: 882 KB, 1417x1890, 20190914_210124.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13865670

>>13864566
What's your major then?

>> No.13850057 [View]
File: 882 KB, 1417x1890, 20190914_210124.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13850057

>>13849302
Bitch ass detected. Anon please keep talking, I get off on illiterate shits complaining about mundane things.

>> No.13849524 [View]
File: 882 KB, 1417x1890, 20190914_210124.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13849524

>>13849379
Exactly my issue. I know I exist in some form, but what can I know beyond that? If I arrive at true skepticism, then how do I know I'm even skeptical? That is based on a logical conclusion, but skepticism refutes logical conclusion. Yet that is also a logical conclusion, and so on and so on in an infinite regress. The issue with this line of reasoning I've arrived at is that a logical attempt to refute it just further feeds into the loop

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]