/lit/ - Literature

>>21514273
Because science isn't really secular if you think about it. It's fundamental aim is to understand Creatiom better so that we may love He who created it more for creating order and giving us life and being through it. That's the way people like Roger Bacon and Rpbert Grotesste thought of science in addition to the plethora of Catholic scientists over the years like Pierre Duhem, George Lemaitre, Gregor Mendel, Stephen Barr along with many others.On that note,

>>21513972
Stephen Barr's "Modern Physics and Ancient Faith" and Fr. Stanley Jaki's books in general, but specifically "The Savior of Science", "The Purpose of it All" and "Scientist and Catholic" are good reads.

>>15792737
This >>15794769
Also
>Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Ethiopian Orthodox have it.
FTFY. Anglicans and Lutherans are literally Protestant heretics that like Catholic aesthetics. That doesn't mean they have Apostolic Succession (which is only valid if you have Sacred Tradition and don't cut out books form Sacred Scripture, which they clearly don't being Protestant heresies and also did).

>>15696978
>That dislike ratio
>Comments turned off
Heh. Truly God's justice is still present in this fallen world.

>>15645183
I understand that feel OP. It's okay. Focus on your faith and what you need to become a better Christian, even if that means not shitposting for a while or again

>>15646559
That was probably more than 4 years ago when it was less shit and at least you got straight answers rather than this pseudo-ironic shitposting hell the sites in now.

>>15634741
I'm not being literal, mate. Of course, Jesus isn't a DMV. He's fucking God. What I'm saying is there's a scriptural basis for everything I've said, you can't argue with it because I'm right and now you focus on minutia like me using bad phrasing in order to get a point across. That's dishonest in my opinion. Plus, how the fuck do you think people prayed for the first 1000 years of Christianity and why do you think Catholics, Eastern Orthodox and Coptics share so many beliefs despite them being different branches of Christianity yet you think your church (which was made 1500+ years after Christ ascended into heaven) is somehow magically right? Like, I don't think Occam's Razor is a good logical tool at all, but it makes more sense saying that Protestantism is a heresy rather than saying 3 churches who share the same deposit of faith, the same Tradition and have Apostolic succession are heretical, especially considering that the Church Fathers not only agree, but were actively involved with the theology of all said churches during the late Roman Empire.

>>15597946
After Virtue by Alasdair MacIntyre
Anything by Edith Stein
The Everlasting Man by G.K. Chesterson
Anything by Musonius Rufus, Seneca and Epicetus
The Summa Theoloigica (or at least Aquinas' Selected Writings since that goes over his entire career)
The Basic Works of Aristotle

>>14348947
Read The City of God, On the Trinity and the Confessions by Saint Augustine, The Selected Writings of Thomas Aquinas< After Virtue by Alasdair MacIntyre, any book by Edward Feser and The Basic Works of Aristotle edited by Richard McKeon. Also Paramenides and the main Pre-Socratics (or what's left of them), the main Neo-Platonists and Stoics (Christian and pagan).

>>14349480
>>14349488
>Meme religions
>Logos
More like LOLgos

>>14349448
>>14349979
BASED. Also read these.