/lit/ - Literature

>>18287224

Yes, me:

>>>/lit/thread/S17259685
>The Monad and the many per Ne-Si and per Ni-Se are as, if not more, distinct as the Monad and the many are from each other in either perception. Per Ne-Si, the many relate mainly, possible exclusively, to each other, their relation to the Monad being one of at least quantitative deficiency, if not qualitative, whereby each of them is a "part of" the Monad, a continuous outside-in and bottom-up medium culminating in the "individual" of Yaldabaoth: the Monad itself becoming LESS than the sum of its parts, not even an apotheosis of medium at the expense of individuals but the end of medium and individual alike through their mutually-destructive interdependence. Per Ni-Se, the many relate mainly, possibly exclusively, to the Monad, their relation to each other being at least quantitatively tenuous, if not qualitatively so, whereby each of them resembles the Monad, a discrete inside-out and top-down individuation culminating in the "medium" of Pleroma: the Monad itself becoming an explosive subsuming of its parts, not even an apotheosis of the individual at the expense of the medium but the end of even their most fundamental Dyadic distinction through their mutually-dignifying independence.

>>11706754

He doesn't need to. Hence the freedom and mystery of the question.