/lit/ - Literature

>>22947848
Most people read his ramblings from Parerga and Paralipomena (if not chopped up into other books like "Studies in Pessimism"), so they just think he's Mr. Sad-sideburns and are blind-sided to find out he was a dedicated Kantian.
>what is this i thought philosophy was just writing down grim thoughts and stuff, what's a thing-in-itself

>>21454875
No, son.

>>19917471
schopenhauer unironically. You just have to realize that women are not even worth spending the time hating on. Just accept the fact that their mind is flawed, and love them as they are.

>>19711604
>He reads others' interpretations of texts
>He takes other people's 'reviews' as gospel
thats what reading is
"When we read, another person thinks for us"

>>19311675
i do train everyday outside, it does not help.

>>19288535
These are the feels I come here for.
It’s impossible to put pain into words. Only some of us are strong enough to try.. and you did a good try.

>>19277456
Nah, I've read them and I know the perennial truth. Feels bad, man.

>>19249638
but I like Idaho

>>18657118
Neetchuh was a giga-simp who followed some chad and his slut girlfriend around Europe trying to seduce her and failing miserably. Kierk was a based vocel who rejected the tanatalizing allure of cunny in order to pursue a meaningful life of faith. Schoppy was, well just look at him lol. It's pretty obvious who comes out on top out of these three.

>>18481644
>>18483883
thanks
>>18482847
dabbing on women is actual philosophy.

>>18398530
Copenhaur was right on two things: women and Hegel.

Why Schopenhauer's pessimism and metaphysics has been getting more and more famous in the recent years on the internet?

Did Schopenhauer correctly understand Buddhism?

>tfw chronic medical conditions make me completely reliant on The System/industrial society
feels fucking terrible bros...