/lit/ - Literature

>>11102897
>he bases his belief in God on subjective empirical considerations
Jesus Christ, could you be any more of a plebeian?

>a synonym for love is like

Literally quit after the first question. This was made by idiotic intellectual onanists with no understanding of linguistic nuance. Trashy survey, trashy questions, trashy thread

>>9279866
>fringe philosophers like Baudrillard and Nick Land

lel try Canetti and Doust ya fuckin plebe

That someone actually developed a show with the premise "What if Jack the Ripper had a time machine?" makes me think I could shit on a page, mail it to ABC, and in 6 months see ads for a show about a black man attempting to cope with the ever-present burden of white societal demands. And collect royalties in the meantime.

>>9133409
>in general men are conditioned
>women are more generally conditioned
Spooky nonsense, like saying "there's a reason stereotypes exist." There is surely a reason, i.e. a justification, but it's an absurd one, as all "reasons" in that sense are. You're still imputing condescension to a specific gender, you're just saying that the women who condescend are behaving "like men" because of the way they are "conditioned by society."

"Society," in the sense of the sum of an individual's interactions with others, is what I take to be doing the "conditioning" in your daydream.