/lit/ - Literature

He's not wrong, but his arguments are futile.

We can't un-birth ourselves, and bar some kind of insane and impossible technique we can't stop humanity from continuing to have children, or to stop those who want to live and exist from doing so on a world-wide scale.

There are always nukes, I guess.

Heretical though it may be I think I like Ligotti over Lovecraft - though I still love Lovecraft

>>7068724
This fallacy is a huge thing people seemingly can't get over - be it the general public, or tumblr, or anyone.

For some reason very few understand that to read/watch/write/listen to something doesn't mean that you agree with it. It's as though those people think the only things that anyone pays attention to are the things they absolutely love - to waste time on something they don't love, even just to lean about it, is out of their understanding.

It's absolutely crazy. Similarly, if a creator of a work does something bad, so many people inherently believe that everything they created is similarly evil and unlikable. Cosby is a rapist, but he's done some funny work. Roman Polanski is probably a pedophile, but Chinatown is a great film. And so on.