/lit/ - Literature

>>17176866

I love laruelle and seeing Shinran in that mix is odd, are you that anon whom I spoke to elsewhere about laruelle, boehme and a few others?

I’d give you a 7 or 8 out of 10.

The blanchot/Sade pill goes well together, laruelle is high tier, Berkeley I feel is more building his model solely for the sake of rhetoric against non-idealist and atheists, I’ve found stronger purer models elsewhere especially Hegel.

Bataille is fun but I find Austin osman spare covers much the same ground had better.

Montaigne I find more enjoyable in terms of literary value than his actual conceptions. Rabelais is a fun time but I honestly am not transgressive and don’t seek that kind of freedom of arbitrarity

Shinran is based, odd to see him here, not my favorite Buddhist though.

Haven’t read Michel Leiris nor have I read read Duvert but I suspect from what I do now I wouldn’t like him at all.

My list is still husserl, hegel, meinong, agrippa, boehme, John Dee, Kenneth grant, Iamblichus, Bertiaux, Abhinavagupta, Deleuze, gikatila, Linji, abulafia, merleu-ponty and Ge-Hong