/lit/ - Literature

>>15165425

They are neither more nor less than conceptually constructed, but this construction is their reality as such, far more solid than a Materialist or otherwise "external" one.

>>14378926
>who monitors all people all the time, and punishes all those who commit moral wrongs (in direct proportion to their wrongdoing).

But this is already happening, and "has happened" and "will happen" as well. Those who distinguish themselves wrongly and rightly from God are immanently displeased and pleased, respectively, and their apotheosis, their particularity earnestly taken for its word by the Absolute, will either be destroyed by fire or consecrated by light.

1. The question is wrong.
2. This is true. Proof itself can barely hold the most mundane things, never mind God. It is also the case that the more immanent something is, like you being a Self, the harder and more awkward it is to prove it. Proof being best suited for unthinking, dead, all but nonexistent things, like Number.
3. He shouldn't. The choice is yours.
4. Objective EXPEDIENCE is dumb. Just because Morality is almost totally conflated with expedience by Man does not mean that it is likewise conflated by God.

>>13561259

1. The question is wrong.
2. This is true. Proof itself can barely hold the most mundane things, never mind God. It is also the case that the more immanent something is, like you being a Self, the harder and more awkward it is to prove it. Proof being best suited for unthinking, dead, all but nonexistent things, like Number.
3. He shouldn't. The choice is yours.
4. Objective EXPEDIENCE is dumb. Just because Morality is almost totally conflated with expedience by Man, it does not mean that it is likewise conflated by God.

>>13047348

The Republic is a metaphor for the Self in its most particular aspect, Man.

>>13015258
>>13015365

Regarding omnibenevolence, bodies:

The good of true freedom, not as contractual formality but to be your own rational actor not only after having been "created" but as you're being "created" and most of all IN being "created", is greater than the good of Ontogenic busybodying. Since the body itself fundamentally and wholly is a somatization of your very Self, it is just as vulnerable to error. To let everything be in and of its own, not as a curiosity in an otherwise tyrannical world, but to truly let it be a Monad like THE Monad, this is Omnibenevolence.

>>13013349
>abstract

Anglo "Empiricism" is just Catholic finger-wagging about worshiping Earth mommy. Hegel is practically the ONLY Western Empiricist proper, who spoke of the Phenomenal simply as it is.

>>12976583

Dialectic & Gospel.

Can god imagine something hes not capable of doing?
If yes then hes not really omnipotent
If not then hes also not really omnipotent

By definition an omnipotent entity cannot be defined, then what is god? Why do religious fags assume the existence of something that cant even be defined
What they are really worshipping is the void

>>12713187

Today is always empty. Keep in mind that your prerogative of the particular is as true as your prerogative of the absolute. That by which the inviolable person is so in the unconditioned present and that by which "God" is in "Heaven" are one and the same.

>>12518120

Moses is right in objecting, as is Cain. Compare to Noah and Job, whereupon God brings calamity simply because they allow it.

>>12307158

The temporary and the changing must pass and change from and into the absolute. Individuation sufficient for a single instance of ending or changing cannot arise from fundamental entropy and chaos since such things have no potential for generating any and all things you know of - entropy scrambled by chaos or chaos arrested by entropy only results in mutually aggravating entropy and chaos, never in them having respite from themselves or from each other - and less potential still for maintaining them with any staying power or order at all, least of all from basal nothingness.

>Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.

>>12275261

Top tier: I and the father are one.

High tier: I am contained by the father.

Alright tier: I am begotten by the father.

Middle tier: I am set into motion by the father.

Bad tier: I am I and the father is the father.

Bottom tier: I am I and the father is unknown.

Shit tier: I and the father are unknown.

>>12135287

Job is selfish in only considering the relation between God and suffering when he himself becomes afflicted. It is implied that God could have destroyed everyone and everything around him and Job would have thought nothing of it. Job's conclusion or lack thereof being as strange as God's explanation or lack thereof. The story reveals the idea of ironic divine punishment, warning that the absolute is good and the particular is bad, as earnest henotic empathy, warning that the particular unknowingly IS the absolute and that it would have an awful experience were it to see itself reflected as such. In this case God perfectly mirroring Job's casual selfishness.

>>12130997

http://gnosis.org/naghamm/sjc.html

The Sophia of Jesus Christ.

Plato, duh.

>>11733907
>>11733944
>>11733956
>tfw plato's forms and dialectic subsume abrahamic formal logic

But seriously, there is no reason to suppose that God perpetuates outwards Ontologically, essentially by and through barriers that distinguish and separate said perpetuation.