/lit/ - Literature

>WE WANT THE FUNK
>GIVE UP THE FUNK
>OW WE WANT THE FUNK
>GOTTA HAVE THAT FUNK

What did he mean by this?

More like pic related was proven right again.

>>14597405
Yes.

>The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionising the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society. Conservation of the old modes of production in unaltered form, was, on the contrary, the first condition of existence of all earlier industrial classes. Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast-frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses, his real conditions of life, and his relations with his kind.

So if capitalist technology is progressive and Marxist metaphysics endorses this progression, why do we pretend like there is a meaningful debate to be had between them?

None of his predictions came true