[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.21858382 [View]
File: 84 KB, 500x201, deconstruction.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21858382

>>21858317
April fools, bb. I like the goofy little triforce logo.

>> No.15019893 [View]
File: 84 KB, 500x201, deconstruction.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15019893

>>15012434

>> No.14733477 [View]
File: 84 KB, 500x201, deconstruction.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14733477

>>14732146

>> No.14682310 [View]
File: 84 KB, 500x201, deconstruction.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14682310

>>14680871

>> No.14571539 [View]
File: 84 KB, 500x201, deconstruction.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14571539

>>14571525
9/10 - it's missing a little something. Everything here is solid, though.

>> No.14382823 [View]
File: 84 KB, 500x201, deconstruction.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14382823

>>14382493
In all fairness, most philosophies could be summarized quite succinctly. The major bulk of most philosophy that I have read is not the theses themselves but the defenses of the theses. The great rub is that without the accompanying defenses, the various philosophies look vague and weak with permutations.
>I honestly don't think I could do that.
You likely just know that whatever summary you made would be easily deconstructed without the bulk of the defense that is associated with it.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]