/lit/ - Literature

>>15193856
He can't be making much money from being an eceleb, he doesn't have enough of a following. Whether he is a wagie or not i don't know, he lives with his mum though so he's probably a NEETchad

>>15039923
>the corporate bootlicker wagecuck pledge

>>14954783
a) if she continues that career and lets me stay at home to write

>>13895356
>>slaves back then
>>do quality work 35 hours a week
>>get food and housing
>>live in a beautiful society
>>have respectful masters
>able to still have a family

>>slaves now
>>do shitwork 80 hours a week
>>get ziocoins
>>get cuckshed and poisoned food and water in exchange for ziocoins
>>live in the ugliest society ever
>>your masters are as spiritually impoverished as you are and spend their ziocoins on things that make it even more impoverished
FTFY

This is a NEET board.

Don't worry wagie's, you can still post here. We know this is the only thing you have stopping you from blowing your head off with a shotgun, kek. Just watch your step, you have so much to lose heh.

>>13514419
NEETS CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WIT IT

No one should ever work.

Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world. Almost any evil you'd care to name comes from working or from living in a world designed for work. In order to stop suffering, we have to stop working.

That doesn't mean we have to stop doing things. It does mean creating a new way of life based on play; in other words, a *ludic* conviviality, commensality, and maybe even art. There is more to play than child's play, as worthy as that is. I call for a collective adventure in generalized joy and freely interdependent exuberance. Play isn't passive. Doubtless we all need a lot more time for sheer sloth and slack than we ever enjoy now, regardless of income or occupation, but once recovered from employment-induced exhaustion nearly all of us want to act. Oblomovism and Stakhanovism are two sides of the same debased coin.

The ludic life is totally incompatible with existing reality. So much the worse for "reality," the gravity hole that sucks the vitality from the little in life that still distinguishes it from mere survival. Curiously -- or maybe not -- all the old ideologies are conservative because they believe in work. Some of them, like Marxism and most brands of anarchism, believe in work all the more fiercely because they believe in so little else.

Liberals say we should end employment discrimination. I say we should end employment. Conservatives support right-to-work laws. Following Karl Marx's wayward son-in-law Paul Lafargue I support the right to be lazy. Leftists favor full employment. Like the surrealists -- except that I'm not kidding -- I favor full *un*employment. Trotskyists agitate for permanent revolution. I agitate for permanent revelry. But if all the ideologues (as they do) advocate work -- and not only because they plan to make other people do theirs -- they are strangely reluctant to say so. They will carry on endlessly about wages, hours, working conditions, exploitation, productivity, profitability. They'll gladly talk about anything but work itself. These experts who offer to do our thinking for us rarely share their conclusions about work, for all its saliency in the lives of all of us. Among themselves they quibble over the details. Unions and management agree that we ought to sell the time of our lives in exchange for survival, although they haggle over the price. Marxists think we should be bossed by bureaucrats. Libertarians think we should be bossed by businessmen. Feminists don't care which form bossing takes so long as the bosses are women. Clearly these ideology-mongers have serious differences over how to divvy up the spoils of power. Just as clearly, none of them have any objection to power as such and all of them want to keep us working.

Sometimes i stay in bed, cuddle up with my waifu and read a little bit in the morning.

NEET (independently wealthy) > /lit/ career > NEET (relying on welfare state, parents ect) > student > wagecuck

>>12574789
goodnight boys, stay free

>>12573157
>>12573136
BASED

Yes. Anyone who says otherwise is just a wagie filled with resentment.

What are some works of literature that embody this ethic?