/lit/ - Literature

>>20101838
yeah no, I'd argue on a basis of anachronism if you're just gonna call that meme while it has been art, etc.
The Mona Lisa sure has memetic force, etc.

Shit just gets very fucking messy if we start calling picrel art.
Not that I'd have the solution to all the distinctions here - but if you've studied art history, you surely know how confused things are.

blablabla, some students need to get paid after university, etc.
I don't know man

fuck off, this is anti-oedipal soil

gang gang?

>>17251608
hi everyone im new!!!! *holds up rhizome* my name is giles but u can call me T3H B0dY W1tH0uT 0RgANs. as you can see im very nomadic!!!! thats why i came here 2 meet nomadic people like me _... I'm 50 years old (im dead for my age tho!!) i like to read spinoza (im neovitalist if you dont like it deal w/it) he is our favorite author!! bcuz its SOOOO panenhenic. Felix is deleuzian 2 of course but i want 2 meet more deleuzian people =) like they say the more the merrier!!!! lol…neways i hope 2 make alot of freinds here so give me lots of commentses!!!!
N0MaDiSM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <--- me bein deleuzian again _^ hehe…toodles!!!!!

love and rhizomes,

T3H B0dY W1tH0uT 0RgANs

he's one of the greats of history

>>16422825
Delezue & Guittaro have just as much meme potential.

I miss Deleuze-posting

>>14765689
I didn't mean to imply that Miller was connected to the 70s counterculture (although he probably was through Kerouac), just that he was just as much a quotable weirdo.

>>14765582
I wonder what Lula thought of him, he seems quite down to earth (although just about everyone in the world seems that way compared to Guattari).

>>14339421
>>14339392
>>14339396
I think you're taking this meme test a bit too seriously

>>14261060
This century will be Deleuzian
Primo zoomer lit

>>14251357
No

>>14236547
almost
just need to finish up D&R
it's good, but anti-oedipus was more fun

I love this picture so much

Lets go, boys
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOKIJG4lJ_g

>>13341277
Here

>>13259559
indeed, it's not that simple;

Edogawa Ranpo is right into your alley

>>13179050
Just watch anime

>>12941722
this

I was wondering if anyone was familiar with this "going in blind technique" my professor has recommended me to start reading pic related's bibliography, batallie and a bit of freud. The issue is only have the greeks and a few medieval books(i'm and undergrad). Anyways from being on here all the time the thought of skipping years of thought seems incorrect and absurd to me but my prof. assured me that going in blind was by far the best technique and I would eventually go back on my own. Can anyone confirm that they've used this technique before? I suppose it makes sense since we can google pretty much anything we don't understand? I'm just so use to the linear progression you fags tell me about that this seems fucking absurd to me.

>Supposed to be read by teenagers
>can't make head or tails of it

H-help

>D&G have fallen out of favour with /lit/

>>12241684
Obligatory.

>>12149420
>a sort of buggery
>I imagined myself as arriving in the back of an author and giving him a child
>decenterings, slippage, breakage, secret emissions that gave me a lot of pleasure