/lit/ - Literature

If two or more people are in a situation in which at least one person can’t survive, then what is the kantian solution? Should they all just die?

So kant argues that math problems like “5 + 7 = 12” is synthetic apriori knowledge. Which i get but he also claims, as far as i understand, that all knowledge is based on experience and what we perceive with our senses and not actually “things in themselves”. So by this does he mean we have no knowledge that our vlaims of mathematics are true outside of our experience? Is it therefore true that hes arguing that, outside of our experience, 7 + 5 might not equal 12? Am I misunderstanding him? What is he exactly saying between the relationship between math as we understand it and how the universe is in and of itself, outside of our experience?

>>17591627
In "Fundamental principles of the metaphysics of morals ," what does kant mean by "Will."
actually what does he mean by "duty" too and the other shite he says. He doesn't seem to clearly define his terms.

>>15936326
only domesticated animals masturbate. Im going in

How do I approach Kantian Kantian philosophy? Ive been reading the Prolegomena and Ive been struggling, despite understanding some of it.

Recommend resources, books or videos to understand Kant.

>>14245395
>>14245399
no philosophy is definitely germany

This next song's called Wonderwall, sing along if you know the words.

You will never defeat him.

how do people take pseud seriously after Guenon btfo him so bad, I just don't get it.

Like all of his thought is just going full-retard about how what you perceive isn't actually reality that the Indians were already talking about in the 2nd millennium BC; like talk about beating a dead horse lol

If space and time are sensibilities, then isn't all a priori deduction stemming from sensible experience?

Does Kant argue then, that all our knowledge is from experience, or sensibility? I know he himself acknowledges this as a paradox, but I don't get his explaining it away.

>*solves all of philosophy*
>"hehe, nothing personal kid"

Help, it seems completely arbitrary to me what Kant makes up to be a priori in Pure Reason and Prolegomena.

>its a Kant tries to fix epistemology, ethics, and metaphysics then proceeds to do so, the absolute madman! episode

phenomenology of the spirit

but apparently i have to through this autistic cunt first