[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19956241 [View]
File: 41 KB, 245x239, 1632952721674.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19956241

>>19956196
>>19956217
>catholic theological arguments
Go pay your indulgences :^)

>> No.19948515 [View]
File: 41 KB, 245x239, 1628066234632.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19948515

>>19946821
>I want literature we can agree on that’s great.
Oh gee, I dunno, how about THE BIBLE

>> No.13567081 [View]
File: 41 KB, 245x239, 1563945439211.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13567081

C'mon I know some of you fags read it

>> No.12375424 [View]
File: 41 KB, 245x239, 1544253056322.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12375424

>immersing myself into the works of a pre-21th century philosopher
>conveys rational arguments, genuine insight, and poses critical questions
>suddenly the topic of homosexuality is mentioned: "only penis in vagina produce baby + men kissing is icky! Therefore homosexuality is objectively wrong and unethical!"

Is there any rational philosophical exploration of homosexuality to be found before the late 20th century?

>> No.12289541 [View]
File: 41 KB, 245x239, 1544253056322.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12289541

Ethics is an elective course which plenty of student at my college take because it's supposed to be easy. I just finished reading a 20 page summarized rant by my professor on why moral relativism is wrong and fallacious. Is that a common opinion across modern philosophical literature?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]