/lit/ - Literature

>>8876441
>implying socialism is pauperism
>implying both markets and planning are anything more than tools to develop the productive forces
>implying the base does not determine the superstructure
>implying the development of the productive forces can't take place under the alliance of the workers, farmers and entrepreneurs for the benefit of all
>implying the commanding heights of the economy are market-dependent in China

>>8761546
>current year
>using 'totalitarianism' as if it's still a real word
>implying China claims to be communist instead of just working towards communism via the use of capitalist tools in a capitalist-dominated world
>he doesn't know about bird cage theory
>he doesn't believe in the development of the productive forces
>he doesn't know about the economic base determining the superstructure
>he's an ultra-left shill who seriously thinks you can bypass the capitalist mode of production instead of it being intrinsic to the creation of an alternate socialist mode of production
>he doesn't understand that capitalism depends upon the assertion of market dependence and that 70% of China's economy, being still controlled directly or indirectly by the Party, is in the final analysis sensitive to but independent of the power of the market, instead being beholden to the Party, which while beset by corruption and containing members of the business elite amongst its highest ranks does not possess a class character but for that of the statis bureaucracy, and so cannot be said to be one and the same with the capitalist class, which it attempts to manage for the good of the population rather than for the narrow interests of that capitalist class itself
>he probably sleeps with a picture of Hua Guofeng under his pillow