/lit/ - Literature

>>21562742
Thank you, yes this is what was meant and what i typed.

>>21562680
Ive read a good amount of his work and i simply dont agree with his solution. He mistakes a symptom, industrial technology and such, for the cause of the problem. I also disagree with his definitions on freedom. There is much he got right though, he accurately describes the Left, the problems affecting the West and more.

Keep reading anon, you will get better at comprehension. Have another pic, this time over a technological city.

>>21511778
If you are listening to people because they are wealthy, you are not interested in truth. This is the opposite of aristocracy and leaders of men. You listen to them because they have magnatism, authority and an instinctual manner which reassures and inspires confidence. Like a RSM or an experienced Sergeant in a section. Wealth can obfuscate these qualities and is often mistaken for them.

>>21419749
>you don't accept that nazism is just a militarized version of liberal-capitalism
Because it is just idiotic to even say such. It was born from many Socialist impulses, most of the early National-Socialists were themselves former Marxist-Communists aggitators. Your conception of National-Socialism is a Communist characture.

Struggle and hardship, not war, is the goal. To overcome difficult situations and be rendered stronger by the journey is the concept. There is no promise of utopia at the end of a hard journey in NS, the journey is the reward. This is one of the things that sets it apart.

>Don't understand what's going on in Ukraine or the emerging multipolar world
There has never been a multipolar world, there is Athens vs Sparta, Rome and Carthage, West vs East. The appearance of multiple points does not preclude the obvious fact that the same group of people are easily able to manipulate them all to further cement a more globalist political landscape.

>>21054330
That has been said every single time before a new power structure arises. It does not arise out of it but rivals it and subsumes it.

>>21033166
>You could be fit and still enjoy anime for example.
Im inclined to disagree at the principle you are implying here. There are a small handful of behaviors which immediately destroy any interest a woman may have, just as there are a handful of the same that can destroy a man's interest in a woman.

While the rare individual may be able to get away with it, the majority of average males simply do not have the ability to engage in self-damaging behavior and still enjoy full interest from potential mates, especially from ones that are highly desirable, those being attractive, fit, wealthy and traditional partners that the incel community typically reserve their hatred for.

>f anything I disagree with joining the military nowadays. If a war is not fought for the sake of God and/or for the sake of defending your family and homeland then there is no point in participating in it.
I will also disagree with this. You join because it is a risk. That you have put yourself between danger and something else. The mindset of being able to engage in conflict is the goal here, not the philosophical reasons for a war.

Wars if aggression and resources too are entirely valid, if Russia was not a corrupt shit-tip of a nation and actually took Ukraine in a manner that it had hoped, the current political landscape would be very different. Nations, specifically Poland and Finland, may suddenly wish to engage in territory expanion, where I a man in those nations I would quickly enlist to do so.

>>20998722
>That wasn't that strong of a view held by Hitler though.
Yes it was sir, in both Mein Kampf, party material, speeched and the writings of others. It was the keystone of the movement.

>Hitler generally saw the nation as wherever the folk was and while farmers were important and got special treatment he didn't see much of a higher spiritual significance with the land if there were no people on it
They were the bedrock of their racial stock, so much so that SS Officers were instructed to find rural women for wives. They were the manifestation of blood & soil. Being intrinsically tied to both.

>Through the blood and soil lens (which is in my opinion quite often the better view even if it should be more implicitly stated) all of old Prussia should still be considered German.
It is as if you have never read Mein Kampf and are coming with your own headcanon on what Hitler thought. If only there was a chapter on Prussian statesmanship, militarism and the Old Empire.

>Esoteric Hitlerism
Not a real thing beyond memes, wild writings of women and incels online.

>>20998743
Read more anon. Id recommend the Ford version.

>>20973480
>they do value equality within the race
No, they don't. They are big on heiarchy, the complete refutation of equality and egalitarianisn. Libertarians, like liberals, want equality of opportunity. Their intellectual origins grew from the left, while Fascism was a refutation of Marxism.

Libertarians are worse than Socialists

>>20964097
>This bond was granted to us by God

This bond predates judeo-christian theology. By cenutiries. Christian theology made Europe strong, but now it weakens and corrupt, like the political system. New values are needed to replace what we have now in the social arena, like a new world-concept is needed to change the political and economic arena.

>>20951042
If your premise were true, it would be true for all other forms of Government, the logical conclusion of your comment is that a Government must inflict sickness on its people to ensure growth remains in check.

>>20937118
What you were saying was just obfuscation and bullshit. It was vague enough to have no firm position to attack or defend. You began with a simple concept and confused yourself.

Blood & Soil. That is the be all and end all of Fascism and National-Socialism. To argue otherwise is to betray the very concepts.

>>20923448
That has not stopped every other political system. Why should it stop this one?

>>20921926
The Japanese are the only other culture outside of those found within Europe that is commendable and worth preserving. Every single other creed, culture and race outside of these are debased and without any merit, despite past glories some experienced.

>>20862627
>You say some wars are justified. But then I say that many wars are not. How do you respond?

I thought that was clear, evidently it was not. Conflict that strengthens a people is desirable. This is the same logic that subjects a child to difficulty just outside their comfort zone, this produces the best growth potential.

War should be made to defend your people and land. Be it now or decades in the future. If a war made now can secure a stronger future at the expense of others, I think a moral argument can be made for it. Do i think i would agree with it? Probably not, no.

Just say you're a National Socialist. Once you admit it, you will find a great weight has been lifted from your shoulders. Eventually, as the movement grows, a figurehead will arise to galvanize the movement and he will be elected and put in power. It happens every single time, 21st century is no different.