/lit/ - Literature

>>11047941
Well that was my original point you imbecile. Petersonfags decry non-science of all groups they disagree with but use them themselves. It's hypocritical.

Jesus Christ, when did /lit/ become the board of brainlets?

>>11002288
>Holy fuck anon this is the dumbest argument I have ever read. You don't need to give people the right to get fed for them to do it.

Well, suppose I, a person in the position of power, just take away all the food from the poor and give it to myself because I feel like this is the right thing to do and I feel that this is just. Any talk that this would be unethical I simply dismiss as "pointless abstract theory". Without any theoretical basis, we are simply led by intuitions, and no intuition can be definitively shown as wrong. You can't prove to me that I should try to redistribute wealth because you feel that this is right. I might just feel that we shouldn't feed people - that's it, done.

Man, conservatives are not only retarded but also stubborn as hell too. We should take away their right to vote and have a much nicer society in the end, considering that they do not understand self-evident, trivial matters like this one.