/lit/ - Literature

>>17901355
Not exactly an argument, but a reason to not be reserved about believing in and living for Jesus Christ is the abundance of anecdotal evidence for Jesus Christ, which are the testimonies of people who proclaim they have been set free from sin's heavy chains of slavery and spiritual blindness and now have new life in Christ, meaning they can now draw near to the divine without guilt and shame and know the living God for themselves, if they so choose.
Following that Biblical literature clearly showcases a dividing line between having belief in God situated in the mind and belief in God situated in the heart, which means that if people love what is innocent, pure and righteous, that even if they don't know of the Gospel, in their hearts such people love the form of God, and therefore believe in God in their hearts, even if they are utterly ignorant and naive. Belief in God in the heart therefore translates to loving God and what God is about. If the pure love God's form before hearing the word of the Gospel, such will find themselves at home through the formal belief and acknowledgement of the Gospel when it comes to them.
Such doctrine or philosophy brings forth the view that in the domain of the heart there is no neutrality, so nobody can have an excuse. If life is what we make of it, making the best out of life, ie conforming to God's nature (and the implications that follow) is what He requires, nothing less than that. So it's reasonable to think that those who are on the narrow path are extremely few.