/lit/ - Literature

>>18376487
He’s a total fucking retard. It’s hilarious to watch him fail to put his argument into a syllogism because it lets you see how horrible it is as an argument and he actually thinks ad hoc is a fallacy (it’s not it’s just frowned upon). Also he is a young earth creationist, so not only is he a retard because he thinks ad hoc is a fallacy, he’s also a retard because be believes in an interpretation of the evidence that is literally only possible through ad hocs.

What is the best book that argues in favor of the TAG (transcendental argument)? Specifically looking for a book that addresses the problems raised by Alex Malpass, especially when he brings up that fact that the presuppositionalist cannot demonstrate the “impossibility of the contrary” since there is practically an infinite amount of non-Christian worldviews. If you want to read Alex Malpass’s arguments in greater detail here: https://useofreason.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/the-problem-with-tag/ . You should also watch his debate with Jay Dyer since he seems to be the most popular presupositionalist on /lit/.