/lit/ - Literature

>>16313259
They don't?

Why aren't you actively publishing erotic novellas on Amazon instead of sitting on half-assed high brow ideas that never go anywhere?

>>10734456
Really depends, hardbacks are great for huge books with lots of information/images, a lot of classics are pretty short and aren't that suitable. I also think people get fooled by the price, they think the higher cost means they use better materials but that's not always the case. I think the biggest downside is how quickly it adds up and how heavy they are. Any time you need to move it will become a nightmare if you have lots of hardbacks. Nowadays I only buy them if it's 100% necessary and I know it's made of good material.

>>10711194
>>10711195
>>10711197
>>10711209
>>10711211
Sorry friendos but it's true. The last panel of >>10711188 contains a proof that 0.999... = 1
Therefore 1.999... = 1 + 0.999... = 1 + 1 = 2