[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.14828222 [View]
File: 15 KB, 306x306, Disapointed Pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14828222

>>14828172
>Are you trying to imply that Anatolians Germans and Celts all look the same? That is certainly not the case.
They genetically cluster close to one another.

>For Victorian England, Irish were not included.
That's empirically false. Anti-Irish propaganda doesn't mean that they were classified as legally nonwhite. Racial anthropologists at the time all agreed that Irish were white Europeans; it wasn't even a question taken seriously.

>For the Nazis, slavs were not included.
Also empirically false. Poles were actually included as an example of an Aryan people on the NatSoc racial document.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_certificate
>A "Swede or an Englishman, a Frenchman or Czech, a Pole or Italian" was considered to be related, that is, "Aryan".

>"how does one define race."
That hasn't been an issue in America. All indo-european groups have always been considered white (italians, armenians, slavs, etc have been in America since the 1600's and were all considered white and generally married into the greater Anglo population - and yes, there were anti-miscegenation laws in place in Virginia, which was the pan-European american hotbed, and it never intefered.)

Maryland actually put their anti-misceg. laws in place in response to the marriage of a black and an irish person. This was in the 1670's I believe.

>Regardless of how you respond to that
Then why bring it up? You just threw a lot of shit on the wall that I had to respond to?

You are arguing in horrible faith.

>my point really is that race is not a characteristic that has any sort of deep spiritual validity.
Evola has explained before that a lot of races generally lack the mental capacity to actual spiritual truths, thus they fall to hedonism, which is clearly the case with blacks. There are some exceptions, but the general populace of blacks follow this trend.

>What is going to be considered "white" will change depending on historical circumstances and your perception of the "other."
Already responded to this.

>> No.14360290 [View]
File: 15 KB, 306x306, Disapointed Pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14360290

>>14360273
please lecture me more with your shitty googled answers. man, we should just scrap med school for google.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]