/lit/ - Literature

>>22313378
I wonder what his nihilist refutation of the friend/enemy distinction would be?

It's a trash version of Carl Schmitt's books. It conveys an aesthetically worse, incoherent and dumb version of everything Carl Schmitt says in The Concept of the Political.

>>20519985
the reason people argue over this kind of stuff is because there is no 'movement', no 'leader' to essentially call the shots and put the breaks and mark the dividing line between friend and enemy. without that there can be no 'war', or conflict.

fascism as it existed in italy is possible anywhere where there is the 'right kind of people' and the right kind of people for fascism are extremely rare especially in today's day in age. fascism was formed in the trenches of WW1- trenchnocracy as mussolini called it. you need a class of men who are soldiers to whom death is not anathema. you need leaders.

with a leader, an order of rank, a myth, and a readiness for violence— the state suddenly becomes in your grasp and it can be molded and changed in accordance to the will. whether that alone is fascism or not is up for you to decide. the 'admirers' of fascism have still yet to agree on whether fascism is socialism or not. what is certain is for me, is that bourgeoisie society is my enemy.

Pic related is the final boss of everything. You will never view life the same after reading his books.

>>19759887
Relevant

>>18724361

What, exactly, was meant by this?

>>17637076
>I can do to disempower people like you.
and we understand the terms of the game. It's not about merit. It's about in-group vs out-group power. That's all it is. Any gain for you is a loss for me and vis versa.

>>17456614
It's just race war. The browns don't want to read the works of the whites who they view as their enemies. Simple as. As >>17457132 points out, the classics are superior to what our atomized consoomer atheist society produces. So why reject them? It's all about power. Which is fine. I don't think brown lesbians need to read European lit. They really ARE too dumb to understand it, or to gain something from it. Let everyone read his own, I say. People naturally segregate, and that's fine.

>>16849426
>echo-chambers are bad except on my subreddit

>>14248356