/lit/ - Literature

>>15330435
>Peter Economy
>Best-Selling author of Writing Children's Books For Dummies
. . .
>ABC For Dummies
>By the Best-selling Author of XYZ For Dummies

Oh. Kay.

>>14019003
>>14019005
>>14019012
>>14019019
>>14019026
>>14019031
These are all quite interesting and make perfect sense to me (haven't read anything he has written but am familiar with Jung) however what his main problem is (here where he actually remains respectable), is the over abstraction into a sort of in-directed expansiveness. Quite Jewish really. And this is all as far as the areas he is correct, in the areas (and there are a few) that his writing and graphs (in this type) are incorrect I will ignore for they serve no purpose to be mentioned. The parts which contain truth however serve only really as a mental organisation of various and general ideas and functions of man - anxiety/war etc. This organisation is fine and actually quite entertaining and enlightening the problem itself (and again I stress this is only so far as the truthful contents) is the lack of genuine directed-ness. It doesn't quite lead one anywhere, an interesting read and an affirmation of certain key and the keys to mans fundamental existence however still lacking in its own property.

I suppose what it really exists as is the organisation of Jung's thought into a diagram. I am this anon btw:>>14019131

>>14017687

>>11961864
>. Reception studies, which is the study of how the ancient world, which remains deliberately vaguely defined, was/is conceptualised, is a blossoming realm in classics