[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.17037556 [View]
File: 70 KB, 1280x801, 5724572547.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17037556

>>17037552
kek

>> No.16990148 [View]
File: 70 KB, 1280x801, 5724572547.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16990148

>>16990074
Leave the cave.

>> No.16748782 [View]
File: 70 KB, 1280x801, 5724572547.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16748782

>>16748056
Windswept fallen leaves
Earth's crunching orange blanket
A chill whistles past

>> No.16593879 [View]
File: 70 KB, 1280x801, 5724572547.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16593879

>>16593760
>How can you hold space and time to be separate a prior sensory intuitions when general relativity first unites space and time into a 4 dimensional manifolds and second proves that they aren't sensory intuition inherent to the mind and that they seems to exist independently from the mind
Because space and time (or spacetime, makes no difference) as a priori forms of sensibility refers to the way in which things can appear to us, that is, always in a space and always in an order before and after other appearances. It doesn't depend on the "actual" structure of the noumenal world and may not correspond to it at all. There is no claim made about the outer world.
Why do you think talking about what exists independently of the mind has anything to do with a discussion of the mind's sensory forms?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]