/lit/ - Literature

Look, as I understand it, there are some major problems with Kant's work:
>Kant can't posit the noumena if they are beyond the pure forms of intuition
>It is incomprehensible to say that noumena "cause" phenomena if causality is a pure form of consciousness; i.e. if causality deals only with phenomena
>Quine tries to destroy analyticity with poor accounts of synonymy, and tries to prop up some cheeky bullshit with radical empiricism
Which is all well and good, yadda yadda.

But has anyone ever successfully rebutted his Transcendental Aesthetic? That shit is the coolest thing I have ever read in philosophy. I am reading a book on this subject from 1993, and it appears as though NO ONE can deny that space and time are the a priori pure forms of intuition.

>>10988582
>>10990279
>>10990283
>>10990289
>>10990298
I think the knowingness might rest more in his gaze than in his smile.