/lit/ - Literature

>>23182788
>art analogy
also, isnt it more analogous to seeing a painting for the first time (as opposed to how the painting is formed)? the first pages of a book are more like seeing the thing that grabs your attention when you first see the painting.

>>18535244
>I’ve always thought the life of Lincoln was very novel-like and even has some really odd parallels to the life of Christ

americans everyone

>>18276872
>Villeneuve is an amazing director with a great ability to create otherworldly awe through imagery and sound (Blade Runner 2049, Arrival). He's also great at centering performances to anchor films while, at the same time, making them feel like part of a larger thematic universe (Sicario, Enemy). He's a perfect choice for something like Dune (and his early catalog are worth watching as character studies with tight-focused narratives).

>>18212838
>you're too much of an npc to understand that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

>>17768623
is this irish or just made up words?

>>17154497
>>ALPHA MALE
>>17154497
>>BETA MALE

imagine believing in red pill "philosophy"

>>16862733
>socialism are older than capitalism

>>16809685
true, i never experienced love, but still man, fucking cringe

>>16581798
>This. Steins;Gate still has the best romance plot I've ever seen

yuck

fictional shit is gay
If you read fiction You are literally reading fairy tales and you’re a queer

>>14902767
>evangelion wallpaper

cringe

>>14593273
cringe

>>14460392
> it´s intentional guys!!!!! plz like my show!!!!

>>13959626
>Man is inherently a political animal. Any story about anyone will be political.

no

>>13764134
>Darker skinned people’s inventions leaked out to the “barbarians” of thickly forested Europe.

>>13616309
>they´re talking bad about black people wahhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

grow up kid

>>13155357
sure bucko, sure

@13096601
cringe.
i win. youre reply proves it

>>12839940
>the book is better than the other because we know someone dies and the other not

>>12826085
>Zizek will win

>>12737511
>so I can btfo the class with my knowledge on DFW

that´s not how you do it

>>12414337
since you´re butthurted, i´ll explain

>their seizure of the means of production, so to assure the elimination of sexual classes requires the revolt of the underclass (women) and the seizure of control of reproduction

idk in which world she lives in but 100% of western women have choice about wanting to have sex or not, regarldess of reproduction or not, we, the men are at disadvantage here, the woman who we´re courting doesnt like us? we´ll we can reproduce, it´s simple as that

>the new population biology as well as all the social institutions of child-bearing and child-rearing. ... [T]he end goal of feminist revolution must be, unlike that of the first feminist movement, not just the elimination of male privilege but of the sex distinction itself: genital differences between human beings would no longer matter culturally.

what it is that´s so oppresive that she wants full revolution, control over their own bodies? well guess what, they already have that, child bearing? yes, when divorces happens, most of the time the custody of the kids is granted to the mom

are you happy now retard?

i bet a woman was the one who praised him, i often experience that women are easy to impress

>a nigger with inferiority complex that´s pushed by the media


no thanks