/lit/ - Literature

>iq

>>21017312
>>21016771
>>21016778
>they think relativism is still trendy

>>14204554
>le heaven and hell was just a metaphor!!!

>I'm a Peirceian

>>12200753
>I'm not English, I don't get it.

I have a philosophy question. Can the erudite redpill philosophers on /lit/ help me? I believe asking you learned men who discuss difficult philosophical problems with the irreverent authority that only comes from passionate, arduous scholarship, will be more expedient than this lass figuring it out on her own.
Here it comes:

I was reading something and forgot where it was, I believe the most likely location is in the Standford encyclopedia of philosophy, somewhere in the pages on either location and mereology or plural quantification, or their citations, but I don't remember as I was very high spinning around, could be anywhere and prehaps it was in some journal. It was about someone who wrote about the mind as existing in context, it sounds very similar to what Peirce says about mind existing in the mind of nature(I don't think this can be properly interperted as a kind of panpsychism) and that thinking is the 'process' of paying attention to certain parts of the continuous development of the reality of thirdness represented in signs. That semiotic reality is what I like to call the reality of living thirdness.
Does anyone know where this radical contextual substantivalism comes from? I'm very interested in studying analytic metaphysics with Peirceian semiotics.

My blessed teachers, thank you in advance for your wise words.

>thinking it fucking matters at all

*Deconstructs your deconstruction*

>>10728398
>12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos by Jordan Peterson
Almost got me desu