/lit/ - Literature

>>20923683
>there are only 4 political ideologies, ergo i will now try to determine yours via elimination
No...

Also I'm not a social parasite, I provide great use to society through my work (thx for reading my blog post)
>>20923691
>Wouldn’t you of all people consider eugenics a good thing?
No, because I'd be dead.
>If we bred for things like IQ, creativity, fertility, empathy
That doesn't work. It works for animals, it doesn't work for humans. Because humans are not animals.
In order to try and achieve something like this, you would have to first, paradoxically, abandon empathy, abandon your humanity, and turn into a cold-blooded child murderer. There's no other way to cull the bad genes without stripping humanity away. And that is incongruent with my principles.
>>20923693
>Do you believe in evolution?
Evolution as in what? I'm not knowledgeable enough in biology to make such statements, but the idea of natural selection makes sense to me. Although I'm also a creationist, but I don't think theory of creation and process of evolution are mutually exclusive...
>Do you believe that trans women are in fact, women
No. This is not an example of human side ignoring biology - because dichotomy of male and female goes beyond biology. Male souls and female souls are different. An animal can do whatever, like a clownfish can actually switch its sex if need be, but that's not the same.
But even with that in mind - the actual harm that LGBT does to culture and society... If they had some kinda magically perfect mechanism that for real 100% transforms your sex, without any botched surgeries and bloody teratomas, it would still be morally wrong to do so.
>>20923695
That sounds like a no true scotsman's fallacy to me