/lit/ - Literature

>>14785649
> retardedly ignore that both the US and western Europe are near a societal collapse just because of these reasons related to mass migration and hence racial diversity WITHIN the respective countries?
This claim isn't substantiated anywhere you're arguing about this societal collapse while providing no metric for reaching this conclusion other than more immigration. You're trying to prove a point that absolutely requires some form of empirical evidence then provide none but rather rely on some tirade about racial divesity which your only argument against being that it causes conflict which you then later contradict by saying that "But in the end, it's all about winning land, stealing their raw materials and wealth or simply for geostrategical and power benefits"
>I guess you willingly don't see the racial tensions and issues that are fought over in the US?
> It's because the division that was created with immigration, where different races have different opinions based on their race.
Once again you're arguing a point that requires some form of emperical basis that you fail to provide. The argument that immigration and demographic change is a source of tension is not shown in any data. The opposite is actually shown that most people have no opinion either way about the concept.
https://www.people-press.org/2019/12/17/views-on-race-and-immigration/
So don't try to run this argument especially since you don't have the data to back it up
> So this historical fact (allthough wrong in details) is the reason why the US will never ever have a civil war based on racial conflicts? Are you an oracle?
Sadly I'm not i'd be much more wealthy if i were but i am capable of doing basic mental calculations of major vs minor issues. I am also especially capable at reading and finding massive contradictions
> Racism is natural and NOT a political agenda
Stating this
>I see the tensions rising and that especially racial minorities are screeching about "muhh rights and quotas" in every aspect of life and society.
And ask yourself, who exactly si pushing for this bullshit. And who furthermore creates division among whites with LGBTQ and other bullshit.
This is all artificial made to divide and rule.
But also stating this is a pretty good example of a contradiction. Secondly your point about racial civil war is based upon near infinitesimal chance does not work argumentatively. Merely claiming that somehow someway something could possibly happen isn't a justification to act upon it.
>So this historical fact (allthough wrong in details) is the reason why the US will never ever have a civil war based on racial conflicts? Are you an oracle?
By this logic we'd be hiding from all sorts of things
> Wow, this is what it looks like, when someone has no valuable points to make.
You crying about ad homs is beyond ironic
> niggers and shitskins
> liberal lunatics
> Globalists
> jewish styled projection
> rootless internationalists

>>13612443
t. white suburban edgelord

>>13033986
I know you're just making fun of the unnecessary warning, but--

>>12643392

>>11993311
i c

>>11793639

>>8877406
fpbp tbqh