/lit/ - Literature

>TL;DR - Karl Popper is full of poop. What books can I read to better throw him inside the oven?
>In literature terms

Hello, /lit/. Semi-literate millennial here.
I barely ever read in my life, but when I do it's books that are very complex, bore me to death and make me struggle to understand until I am finished with this toiling and dreadful task.

Anyway, I basically heard (didn't even read) and skimmed through the main works, concepts and points of Karl Raimund Popper.

Suddenly, I felt afflicted by all mental and spiritual diseases known to all sentient beings who understand the concept of time and space, history alike.

Ligma, AIDS, Cancer all have simultaneously infected my soul just by knowing we live in a society which takes his "literary" works seriously.

I would be very grateful if I could have a list of counter-argumentative literature arguing why Karl Popper is, indeed, more like Karl Pooper, amirite fellas?

Thank you and Godspeed, anon.

"If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them."

>>12512196
>dialetics
Fuck. I hate this word. I hate everything about "muh dialectics" and I get triggered even at the hearing of the name of Hegel. I'm pissed.

>freud can be disproven

>>9217623
Peterson's theory isn't even wrong.
Name one prediction all the moon father slay dragon dominance hierarchy crape doesn't tell us anything new, it doesn't help us predict or model how humans act.

Peterson is worse than the sjw he attacks. Pseudoscientific mumbo jumbo. Apparently even as a free speech advocate he can't seem to get the facts straight, exaggerating the legal implications of the canadian bill.

his sole claim to fame is his appeal to the alt right, who build him up as some kind of intellectual figurehead. ironically he has claimed to detest Nazis.

>>8384187
>somebody said freud wasn't full of shit near me