/lit/ - Literature

Where should I start with him?
I am much interested in aestheticism. I have read much of John Ruskin and have enjoyed him greatly, if that should help.

>>21696707
You are unintentionally correct in that white males who are the only people who can be evil, because we are the only ones capable of good. Good here defined as honor, virtue, loyalty and humility. No other group is able to embody, let alone understand these concepts. The evil of a minority is just animalistic anger that they cant have what they want. Every time this is proven to be the case.

Bored mechanic at work teaching an FNG, what should i do, an AMA or something else?

>>21609495
There is no guarantee of anything, but we can make a reasonable assumption here. That is a man who has been trained and conditioned from his teenage yeare to do fulfill a specific role will perform it better than a man who, with no evidence to support him, convinced people even less able than he is, that he can do the job.

Because a leader is selected democratically, it does not mean he can fo it well. By default, those who did not vote for him are against him and what he wants.

>>21576070
Where would you suggest I find these people? Ive considered looking at my local library and seeing what gatherings are held there. Are there any other groups and places that post-graduates frequent?

He does not know how to smoke cigars, everytime i see him with one he relights the end to get a big draw of smoke. He ruins it every time. He is a crude chimp aping the behavior of greater men, yet understands none of it.

>>21499569
Check out his mothers side too, they were not humble peasants. His father a skilled professional that curiously did not need his only son to follow in his trade. They were junior aristocracy and local leadeds on one side, and well established gentry on the mothers side.

is your only hope against modernity.
Read Sartor Resartus. It is PVRE SOUL. Or else Latter-Day Pamphlets, if you're a bugman reactionary.

>>21445426
>your own wretched Palestein

>>21423341
British Christmas songs are one of the most enjoyable things about Christmas for me.

>>21285186
>reverence for tradition
I am the anon you respondee to.

National-Socialism is not about tradition, larpers and idiotic detractors who have read nothing of it believe it to be ultra-traditional.

> The Nazis WERE a product of the specific historical circumstances in Germany.
This is true of any political expression and culture. Why does it matter specifically to National-Socialism and why should it preclude people adopting it or labeling themselves such?

>>21272224
Because introductions are not written by the original author and are instead written by popular would-be intellectual types who wish to grandstand. Never read forewords, never read introductions unless written by the original author the text they precede.

>>21230934
All you have done is type slurs and offered no rebuttal of counter to OPs image. Your entire post is one pointless diatribe against a position you can not refute. Like a male tranny trying to say why he is a woman, their position is entirely based around destruction of a concept. In your case it is destruction of discourse.

Well done tranny.

>>21054868
>1. The post-war consensus is really anti-Nazism (and anti-Fascism, but especially anti-Nazism). It was clever to group the two together and label it broadly "Fascism". Woke ideology can be described as Nazism turned on its head.
Not at all. The roots of wokeness and post modernism is in Marxism, all intersectionality comes from that very doctrine. Fascism and its more successful offshoot National-Socialism began as a rejection of that.

>2. I am not sure, but it probably can't be predicated on blood and soil alone and how the Nazi program adhered to these in the first place is worth questioning.
Congratulations, you lost your culture, heritage and history. A Blood & Soil philosophy is the only means to secure a viable nation-state, Liberalism, Libertarianism and Leftism in general preclude this.

>3. None. But at some point, people will have to move beyond ideology anyway. The right is stuck in ideology.
Everybody has an ideology, the difference is National-Socialism entails a world-view wherein the goal is continuous and not merely a 5 year plan where fully automated gay space communism can be established where all our needs will be filled. NS incorperates real materialistic conditions in to its view. The struggle, hardship, competition, biological urges like family and agression and beauty all form cornerstones to the ideology. Unlike others, Left and Right, which dictate how things should be, not how they are.

>4. It's probably not. Such affinities are probably perfectly natural in any healthy society. They just shouldn't be elevated to primary political concerns
They are the most natural and they are the best way to unify a people. Protection and improvement of land ans people, Blood & Soil should be the primary concerns and First Principles of any government because that is the most important apects of life and it is from these two that all other concerns stem from.

>>21049737
Wrong again, kike.

A reminder that everybody in Europe was Christian, either devout, culturally or did not care enough to say otherwise. To point out the Nazis were in some way Christian is tantamount to saying they were German. I wonder why it is has heen brought up, especially in unverifiable quotes.

>>20976765
>There is no evidence for that. You have this intution that the European race is simply superior for whatever reason
That would be our superiority in every domain of life. Christian art is beautiful, no doubt about it. That too simply proves the greatness of Europeans, no other Christian culture, or any, has produced art that even comes close. The only common thread is European hands hands held the brush.

>>20960905
>>20960932

Blind worship can not be a duty or obligation.

>>20960989
Stop going to reddit.

>>20955596
Fuck Ukraine and Russia. Im Scottish. But please, let us not be enemies. What are you reading or writing?

Do you like Thomas Carlyle?