/lit/ - Literature

>>8754532
Vasher was Zahel, doofus.

>>7933829
Plus we have Dragonsteel after that which WAS going to be another ten books but I believe it's been reduced to seven, as of now. Might get shorter.

Alright nerds, I finally began Foundation like you guys advised me. Around 1/5th through, enjoying it. Thanks faggots.

>>7477455
Stormlight Archive was worldbuilt for a decade before publication. Can't hurt to hope.

>>7009139
>people still don't know about Mistborn being three trilogies
Modern mistborn main character is a Nicrosil Misting and the story involves an Allomancer SWAT team chasing down a serial killer Mistborn.

Future Mistborn will have FTL travel and will be a space opera.

>>6768525
I forgot to re-add it. It's not very consequential. I can always keep it for strictly contextual replies. Doesn't matter to me.

>>6754455
You could read Sanderson's other works.

I think we get Shadows of Self around October, then we'll get... Bands of Mourning(?) around February.

>>6754459
See, you're showing that inherent bias I was referring to in my previous post.

It's difficult to find a reasonable debate all across the website.

>>6691412
My read was the same and I don't know why either.

>>6619233
Have you not read the books? We don't know much more beyond that as of yet. We don't even know much about the Spiritual Realm in general.

>>6380090
Adding on to this anon's post.

Anon had the right idea but let up towards the end. Kingkiller Chronicles IS bad and should not have anything wasted upon it whether it be money spent on purchasing, time spent towards reading, etc etc. The series is abominable and Rothfuss has demonstrated raw talent in excelling in writing filth.

>>6256125
Death Gate was a fun read. Seconding this.

>>6172822
The pacing is bad in WoK and notorious for the middle area of the book being the worst, especially regarding Bridge 4.
Also, lots of exposition and whatnot in the first book which is why you get infodumped.

Regardless, it's good, fun, and shit gets fucking real later on.

>>6173324
You'd be correct. It's a trashy book.

>>5259383
You're cute.