/lit/ - Literature

>>20545804
I was also a /mu/tant until I started browsing /lit/. We probably started browsing around the same time. The /lit/ 100 was a much bigger deal. People seemed to take reading more seriously. /pol/, /his/, /x/, /r9k/, and reddit were contained. Less shilling besides NYRB threads. There were better and more in-depth discussions, especially about poetry. Rimbaud was big. John Williams’s Stoner was big. More people telling you that Holden sexually assaulted—or raped, according to some—Phoebe. Gregor Samsa was a hermit crab or maybe a beetle but definitely not a cockroach. Nabakov was more popular. Short story threads were more common. There was better advice and less e-celeb/twitter speak. Fewer religious threads, but those who were well-read had worth-while conversations in them. And I was somewhat happy.

>>19681038
It's me again
Have fun

>>19676122
Have fun

>>16944367

Oh wow check this one out

Roll on it boys. Report back with findings

Old thread died

Roll for what short story you read.

Remember that you MUST read what you roll

Roll for a short story. Report back with your thoughts on it.
You HAVE to read the story you get, no cheating, even if the author you get is a woman

Here, OP or anyone else. These take an average of 25 minutes to read (5 - 60 min range). Read it all at once and level up.

Carver, Kafka, Borges, Vonnegut, Joyce

Also anything on pic related

Also also rolling

> Roll,
> Read,
> Discuss,
> Repeat

/lit/, please tell me that one of you guys still has a link to the file with all these short stories. The link on the wikia is not working.

I read all these one, and I need more like this, please.