[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.13572505 [View]
File: 1.14 MB, 1570x1699, 1546694618445.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13572505

>youtube motivational videos
if i wanted facts i'd read scientific and research texts. if i wanted ideas i'd read philosophy.
who the fuck cares about what another cunny looking cunt has to say?
despite having the potential to be the ultimate media form, videos always tend to be the oversimplification of simplification

>> No.13565224 [View]
File: 1.14 MB, 1570x1699, 1546694618445.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13565224

>not completing the abrahamic trilogy each in its original written language
cringe

>> No.13543732 [View]
File: 1.14 MB, 1570x1699, 1546694618445.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13543732

>>13543655
correlation doesn't equal causation retard.
also read the rest of their criticisms against the brain damage claims.
most things in excess can be damaging but Hilton and Watts claim that excessive pornographic use has the same physical damage as fucking cocaine addiction while not providing any sufficient evidence.
the study acknowledges the potential damage of excessive pornographic usage on relationships, sexual and social life but it rejects the claim that pornography causes significant brain atrophy.
drawing such conclusions while being accurate is very hard because people who use porn in excess tend to share a lot of other similar features like being unable to have sex due to physical appearance, lacking in social and communication skills, having lesser friends, having a less healthy lifestyle, not leaving their home as much as others do, etc. all that needs to be accounted for and you need to have a control sample for a study to be sufficient

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]