>>10806335
>You only ever put off the problem of explaining the basis for your criticism via synonymity.
Gee, perhaps this was because all you ever did was ask me to define words and then complain when I told you that an endless chain of defining things would never lead to substantive debate, and then you whinged for about an hour because I refused to define things.
And lo, when I finally give in and define things for you, you complain that all I do is define things.
It's a good thing I was never more than half committed. You were and remain a waste of my time.