/lit/ - Literature

>>16431364
u are forgetting the pajeets.

>>16373607
naipaul is a cuck, you self-loathing pajeet. Go die in a hole or read the vedas, you dravidian mong.

>its another guenonfag gets BTFO by based buddhists episode

>>15085508
>Shankara said

>>13927217
I'm actually willing to cede that Hinduism did some things first and that the Buddha likely took their ideas and modified it (he did study under various hindu teachers so it makes sense). There's only 1 person in this thread who's actually wewuzzing about ALL of Buddhism being based on the upanishads and that the upanishadic lineage never ever appropriated obvious Buddhist innovations even in the face of textual evidence, or the fact that Vedantists themselves have pointed this out when they accuse other Vedantists of being crypto-Buddhist (Shankara et al.).