/lit/ - Literature

>>14882084
>Influence all of Western philosophy
>nearly all of philosophy up until the continental and analytical split uses your theories as a foundation
>Praised by philosophers/scientists/mathematicians
>based aesthetic system
>has the only systematic philosophy that nobody dares to critique
>Hegel's dad and the god father of German Idealism
>a must read for any philosophy student
>sees the evolution of mathematics slowly turning into a profane science
>"all geometry stoopid Euclid only right"
>Noumenon
>Thing-in-itself
>Schema
>A posteriori
>A priori
>etc. +

How can a man be so based

>Want to read all the cool philosophers with outspoken ideas instead of the dry boring Kant that everyone somewhat praises
>Read Schopenhauer and although good 50% of the book is praising Kant
>Read Bataille and he praises Kant
>Read Nick Land for the kek memes and he praises Kant
>Read Mainlander as an extension of Schopie and its him obsessing over Kant
>Read a bit of Fichte and its him trying to desperately copy Kants perfect philosophical system but falls deeply into a confusing fuckfest of ideas
>Talk with teachers assistant at my uni and all hes studied in graduate school was Kant and Plato and never regrets a thing.
>Ask my prof when will dive into heidigger/Deleuze and he just tells me if I study Kant well enough(and a little Fichte) I can dive into any sociology (particularly Weber) and be fine

Is Kant really that influential? Is the ultimate redpill just studying Kant and forgoing everything else?