/lit/ - Literature

>>10819558
>that seemed either ignorant or deceptive, or just careless.
Probably all three. I put shockingly little effort into it. I really didn't expect to be put under the microscope. It's a wonder I'm even defending this point. Annihilation is not the hill I want to die on. It was a hit-and-run thought on the book. I saw the cover, and thought "hey, we read this, let's contribute something." And here we are.

If it helps you sleep, I recant. Annihilation was not genuinely unique. It was, in fact, highly derivative and rather pedestrian.

>>10755541
My mother told me that everybody she knows is currently raving about Goodkind and that series, or whatever. That's women aged 45-65. Take from this what you will.

>>10572186
meh, I hit a nerve bragging and I honestly feel bad about it

>>10572184
yes, all of this