[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21233181 [View]
File: 94 KB, 700x417, gnon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21233181

>>21228181
>Gamergate happened

>> No.20706212 [View]
File: 94 KB, 700x417, gnon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20706212

>>20705725
POV: you're debating accfags

>> No.20168839 [View]
File: 95 KB, 700x417, gnon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20168839

>>20168515
>What accident? There are no accidents in nature
'Accident' / 'Not-accident' is just, like, your opinion, man.

Just because you see the Sun flowing above your head, doesn't mean it actually is (spoiler alert: it's the other way around).

>Reproduction is one functional aspect of sexual beings, but it's not an end.
>Ends exist without any mind considering them
'Ends' do not exist. Do not confuse 'ought'-speak with 'is'-speak.

>Is God then because he can be?
Sure, but not the 'bearded-dude-on-a-cloud-wanting-you-to-go-to-church-on-sundays' type, and more like 'Lovecraftian-Azathoth-Nuclear-Chaos-eldritch-abomination' type.
The aristotelian 'immobile mover', that (at best) doesn't give a fuck about some furless apes on some moving rock in some shithole corner of a galaxy. What is 'correct' and 'good' for an eldritch abomination, need not be good for you, puny human.

>This is extremely dumb
No, it merely means, that you are not smart enough to comprehend, that necessitating a benevolent human-friendly god (Augustine's reasoning that a microcosm ought to be equal to macrocosm, therefore god loves you) based on your intentional apparatus - is either a solid proof of god's inexistence or a grave insult to very concept of Godhead -- because all your intentions and intuitions are heuristics, and as such are hopelessly broken. What you see need not be how it it actually is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Müller-Lyer_illusion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anosognosia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_bias
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introspection_illusion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Wegner#The_illusion_of_conscious_will
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice_architecture

>A mind is not necessary for nature to organize
Your brain is part of nature, duh.
>Ends exist without any mind considering them
And, say, money in reality are just colored papers with curves. It is by ignoring true causality you merge into a hivemind running on the same routines.
'Ends' exist in the same way 'emptiness' exists. They are but placeholders, defined by what they are not. As it has been previously mentioned, the Sun doesn't move about your head, though it does help to think that way.

>somehow they're still ok with mathematics
Mathematics is just a walk-around hacking your own brain's algorithms. Math works not because there is some ontological magical ectoplasm in some Plato's world of ideas, but because those who were miscalculating kept dying for billions of years. But being adapted to environment, means that should something change, all your tools will start shooting you in the leg.

>because things are formed in a way which is good by nature, and when they deviate they are always worse
Literacy is a form of pollution. You were never meant to exapt the mechanism that synchronized your ancestors cries about a dangerous animal in the bushes. Go back to living in a cave.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]