/lit/ - Literature

>>18635838
>assumin you kno' what that means

>>17518788
you

Tell, don't show.

Is the division of Being and meaning a necessary and inevitable one?
Are cartesian duality of res cogitans and res extensa, Kant's schema/content, Deleuze's depth/surface, de Saussure's split sign re-iterations of an earlier, more fundamental, split between Being and meaning?

Does it go back to a Greek conception about ontological categories relating to grammar?

Read 70 pages of Gravity's Rainbow and practiced a bit of piano today. Gonna go study some Greek now and maybe read some philosophy later

Being and Time

>>15363163
>Jesus christ you are an autistic one, aren't you?
Good move anon, when he proves you wrong call him autistic! Nice!

>>15347274
>>What possible career do you work where there isn't politicking like that?
>Science.

>>15163484
>Plants are in lower degree of consciousness to animals as animals are to us

Are you implying the scale of differences here is comparable?

>>15119304
>but dragons will do anything for money

Are dragons a metaphor for jews?
Anyway I think this is great, I had sincerely fun reading it. It's like a whole new concept of writing, not trying to produce anything good, not even applying some kind of thought to the thing. It has potential.