/lit/ - Literature

>>12659615
i thought about starting a thread to talk about this before OP did and while searching for links i made the mistake of searching Nick Land Acceleration on YouTube. nothing good came of this. if Murphy can't talk about this at Southhampton and Land is debarred from even online teaching i'm starting to ask myself if this is unironically one of the places where /acc stuff actually can be usefully discussed, which is absolutely terrifying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INddJT8wxAg&t=105s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkzy1hKMYJc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBztwdu1dG4&t=2s

>>12659627
i see what you did there
>and i like it

>>12659626
still need more, huh? okay. there's another book written by an Italian scholar that was quite good, but the name escapes me atm. basically just the same thing, revolutionary zeal being more or less the same in any form, reactionary modernism. fascinating stuff.

the real question to ask ourselves is what we do with the energies that supply fascism in a post-1990 or otherwise Fukuyaman universe, because unlike Fukuyama i don't think competitive gardening is going to cut it. Nietzsche is right, as always, the real problem is decadence. we can of course channel this into capitalism itself, which was Max Weber's thesis; but doesn't this in the long run just lead back to Land? it's quite a story.