/lit/ - Literature

Haha LMAO!

>>13605610
dont listen to christcucks and idiots. economic reason as well as social ones exist. male motivator is availability of pussy to spend cash on. kids to work for. productivity stability. economy is good. society doesnt collapse as fast. monogamy is enforced and was never natural but naturally polygamous hierarchies dont fly to space exactly for that reason but they fuck each other no problem. think chimps as example where females are promiscuous and not selective at all and its also a matriarchy. thus men dont have to get better cos they get pussy anyway. now that is all fine but human females since last few decades do same but still select for better option rather than any option. but i suspect desperation will drive them to any mate at which point it will be something of an african tier economies of the west. what ends up happening is chads fuck all the pussy. pussy which gives to any chad and betas that get no pussy and none of those women give to any of them. promiscuity or anti monogamy ruins economic growth and family bond the more it is prevalent. where plenty of men dont participate in the economy aka neets weebs incels mgtow because why bother if chad gets all the pussy and you have to work tripple to get same. chad stopped enforcing monogamy so betas stopped too. women were never monogamous. only social structure prevents them from or allows... see islamic nations of up to 4 wives. technically chadslam. then economic downturns as teenagers are less motivated cos all the schoolgirls since early slut brainwash wish to be independent but then realise how hard it is to have a pair because all men quit dating game and thus quit game of life becoming inert bags of wasted potential and then these women off themselves from desperation cos they cant find a man to settle with after all the years of independence by the age of 30 or cut themselves before reaching puberty as a prep for what is coming next. see jonathan haidt and media harm. wyltkm? honk?

Daily reminder that if you've read Nietzsche but inevitably stopped at forming your own opinion about him instead of embracing his teachings then you're prematurely scrutinized to not be a Übermensch; or at least not yet.

Considering Nietzsche as a mere philosopher whose works (Like many other poor ''souls'' in the past) are currently being used as shelf occupiers, exclusively for monetary gains by the ''normie knowledge'' industry (a sort of big pharma of standardized knowledge); that is pure madness.

Nietzsche is a prophet, and only he who overcomes himself and understands how futile every single piece and floor of human society is; only he will truly submerge into N.'s prophetical texts.

>Yes it's ''a'' Übermensch, not ''an'' (This lexical mistake infuriates me)
>I'm sure that atleast one individual will get the ''souls'' reference