[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22849959 [View]
File: 381 KB, 480x479, 1615649891941.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22849959

There is only one cool philosophy.
.

>> No.22358607 [View]
File: 381 KB, 480x479, 1615649891941.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22358607

I read it because of the memes and fell in love with it.
It's pure shitposting energy and quite comfy to fall back into when other philosophy is just draining you again.
Don't listen to anyone trying to talk you into or out of it and for the love of god and every spook out there don't ever read anything on twitter about Stirner.

Read the book or just enjoy the memes and take some of that comfy ego. Or don't

>> No.20800053 [View]
File: 381 KB, 480x479, 1505682C-A5B2-4DCB-BC0A-41BCD41B1386.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20800053

>>20799756
Jung mentions previsages of the unconscious in Schopenhauer’s work, but I don’t remember where he cites it. A lot of the pioneering work on the subconscious was done by Freud and Jung jointly, before their famous split. Freud was a keen psychologist and masterful self promoter (he had some help in that area), but his schemas of the mind were one dimensionally sexual. In Jung’s view, Freud “got stuck” in sexual motivations, while jung plumbed deeper into the subconscious and developed the theory of archetypes and synchronicity, both of which are gravely misunderstood. Although Freud had good insight into subconscious motivations, he has little to say of matters of the spirit, a subject on which Jung is quite vocal. The latter is more important to the modern world than yet more sexual liberation.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]