/lit/ - Literature

>>19753884

>>17607182
>white supremacy
>settler colonialism

>>14060791
Taleb refuted you, get over it.

>>12978485
>The real question is what motivates people to do exactly what I'm doing right now
Ladies and gentleman this is the Peterson fan

>>12973087
[citation needed]
Yikes, sperging retard. Zizek is not against the abolition of classes, the literal verb of which IS revolution.

>>12931823
>nor would I call the Soviet Union socialist

>>12650478
About what? Publishing books? Literary agents? I have been to /r9k/ and its all fedora incels. I try to talk to them about stuff but get ignored all the time.

>>12650482
Lmao, sounds like you have a million dollar concept anon. You should do it yourself and not reveal it to others.

>>12492450
>it is a structural flaw of a novel that a character represents worldviews characteristic of the setting's zeitgeist and not my naive babby relativism

>>12376559
No, the opposite. I believe atheists can't be redpilled.
>>12376540
Mm yes how dare we assume people aren't all equal.
>>12377288
What the fuck are you raving on about? Back to plebbit, retard.

>hur dur god bad problem evil bart ehrman cum on my face
This is what you all look like. Imagine not believing god in the year of our Lord 2019

>>12211661
>/tv/ /mu/

>>12159153
>What is stopping you
Laws and regulations, social pressure, duties as a member of society.

>It goes without saying that...

>>11912413
>I can't refute anyone's arguments so I quote the most subjective ones and claim they're not true

>>11808322
>every single movie you listed is good
I'm confused

>>11767205
Someone explain, Postmodernism is it like i understand its a departure from modernism but is it like traditionalism.

I couldn't read it because i'm stupid.

>>11547449
>looking at reality directly

>thinking your belief in a god, especially any Abrahamic god, has anything to do with knowing some bizarre divine truth

come on, most of you who believe have probably been conditioned to believe in a god since you were born. most of your arguments, save for the shitty ontological ones stolen from shitty "theologians" like Aquinas or apologists like Lewis, are based on personal experience - as if that should hold any objective value in determining what you claim to be is a universal truth. if you're going to base your beliefs off of personal experience and then make the rest of us try and believe your fairy tales, at least recognize your biases: from birth, you have been told that this cosmic dictatorship is constantly watching over you and protecting you. don't you think, or, at least fathom the possibility, that if people had waited until you were of age to use genuine reasoning and critical thinking ability to tell you that you were created by some magical being who demands constant worship and praise and is simultaneously merciless (in the case of syrian kids who watch their families explode before their eyes) and omnibenevolent, that you would have believed any of it?

Is trivialism the only philosophy worth studying?

>>11318373