/lit/ - Literature

>>11766612
Huh? How can that image be Ayn Rand? Clearly since there's no such thing as rationality or objectivity, it's impossible to tell. At most, we can say that the image is a bunch of lines and not much more.

>Causality only exists because we have an overactive imagination
>implies that things do not follow according to their nature
>implies that causality isn't the law of identity applies to action
Aristotle already answered this idiocy millennia ago. Hume just BTFO Locke's theory of perception that he and others before him believe in by pushing it to its logical extreme. By creating a body-mind dichotomy, you essentially negate both from even existing.
:^)

>>11092054
I know who are and you're right.