/lit/ - Literature

>>15202858
t.

I am not talking about just his claims about Christianity/religion, but also his worldview with things like the Eternal Return and the Will to Power. They are concepts that seem to be within almost all social analysis and his claims regarding forces/the will (at least how they were concieved of by Deleuze) have been very influential within continental metaphysics. I won't mention the analytics since they frankly haven't engaged with him very much in the first place.

It seems that no major philosophers since him have believed in traditional identity metaphysics like you would see in Plato. Heidegger, Deleuze, Foucalt, etc. all did away with concepts like identity. Am I passing over something, or did Nietzsche really end metaphysics as it was traditional concieved?

Has any traditional metaphysician responded to Nietzsche's claims?

I made a vid , should I go kill myself because of the existential crisis I face or should I continue making videos ?
https://youtu.be/Emh71lNExbA

>"Oh verily, the vituperations of an ubermensch bereft of the succour of a prime teenage clitoris are a monstrous emanation!"

What did Zarathustra mean by this?

Pic possibly related, I suppose.

Of course suffering leads to greatness, but only if you view it as an opponent that must be overpowered

Memes aside, he IS essentially the most intelligent human being who ever lived, right?

>>6448717

It would be a stretch to call him literary but the second two describe hime to a T

Just finished Beyond good and Evil. Can you recommend me some thing that blows Nietzsche the fuck out?

I know he's juvenile as fuck and I want to see someone more eloquent than myself destroy him

>>6215846
I'm going to give you an unconventional but intuitive grasp of what the ubermesch/last man way of attuning to the world is about.

After a nut is busted and balls are empty and dick is soft for a few minutes, some men experience a phenomenon called post coital tristesse. It's characterized by a general feeling of hopelessness, malaise, melancholy and general feeling of purposelessness. In other words when one lacks power--when they're literally impotent--they attune to the world in such a way that can be characterized as nay-saying. When balls fill up and dick can get hard again, and especially if one has access to pussy, then that feeling is gone. The world is suddenly experienced as enchanted again. One becomes a "cup that wants to overflow." Cheerfulness returns.

In short, depending on whether one has power or not, the world appears as Camus or as Nietzsche saw it.

If mods existed they would not allow shitposting stalinfag to continue therefore I now propose to all of you the Mod is dead

sup, /lit/

I've had an interest in philosophy in college, but never did much outside of some classes I took. Recently, I've been looking to get into Nietzsche. Is his stuff fairy accessible? Besides Ecce Homo, what else can you guys recommend?

What fun facts/interesting can you tell me about the guy? Nietzsche General, I guess.

I'm having a lot of trouble understanding Nietzsche, /lit/. I know he is reputed to be one of the clearer, more coherent philosophers, but I'm only really understanding 1/3rd of his sentences, even after rereading some a few times. I have basically no experience with reading philosophy aside from a lot of armchair discussions with people that had read philosophy, and I had no trouble then.

I'm starting with his Attempt at Self-Criticism, then on to Beyond Good & Evil, and then On the Genealogy of Morals. Should I read other philosophers before him?