/lit/ - Literature

Any books about why woman, wine and song are the most divine of pleasures?

Moral/religionfags need not apply.

Kant: We ought to live our life according to the moral law which stems from our universal capacity to reason practically. The moral law is objective and universally binding, it can be clearly apprehended and reasoned. It evokes a feeling of practical need in us and motivates us to act with virtue.

Nietzsche: The moral law fails us as any concept that claims to be objective and universal betrays its own intent and the necessary subjective dynamic of life. We ought to instead live our life according to what is beautiful/creative and strive towards self-overcoming. Virtues are embodied by individuals who realize this and fully affirm life.

As I see it, these two are the only two viable approaches to life. One puts faith into reason, the other believes reason is subordinated still (to what Nietzsche calls the 'great reason' of the body/organic life). There is of course also utilitarianism and other similar perspectives, but I take it to be trivially understood here that only coombrains find sympathies for those. But, point me to others if you think they genuinely differ from the above.

Anon, which approach to life do you choose?

COME CLAIM YOUR /LIT/FU

>>13962520
The punishment for you posting this big tiddy goth gf in order to generate attention for your thread will be me ignoring your OP and focusing entirely on her fat milkers.

Trips decide
>what I read next
>my philosophy of life for the next month

Existence is worthless and boredom directly proves it.