/lit/ - Literature

>>13130564
You don't understand how dialectics operates. What more of a reason could a person need? I thought you read Marx, how shallow must that reading have been, butterfly?

>>13015217
It's much easier to pretend to understand a book than it is to pretend to understand poetry.

>>12971691
What he means is that Marx was more idealistic than Hegel, so to purge this last bit of idealism we (quite ironically) need to return to Hegel, the philosopher of absolute idealism. His claim that Hegel was the true materialist should be the thing that baffles you, not:
>wad dus marksidm meen whan hegul
when Marx was literally a young Hegelian, and young Hegelianism is literally the closest possible philosophical position you can find to Marxism. He even has the theory of "rebel" which is strikingly similar to alienated class and a master/slave dialectic of history. You don't understand any of the three philosophers you are trying to discuss here.