/lit/ - Literature

>>8646403
you seem to grossly misunderstand what causality means

not only you ignore causality every time when you don't understand the exact mechanism of an event (and when you don't have an alien nearby to claim it's all dem alien technology, as if it were a sufficient explanation) despite there is a clear causality chain for any miracle: god wills -> stuff happens, the first is the cause the second is the result

so, not only you make that already dubious claim, you also claim that god is above causality because he is (ba-dum-tss!) the original cause. that's some orwellian doublethink stuff

>>5244818
True love between a guy and a (very) young girl, and how the world react to this.
Contrary to Nabokov's Lolita, the main character don't feel remorses, and don't think that what they're doing is bad.
I know how "true love" sounds, but is true.

nobody chose their base gender voluntarily like in some mmo
and even if they actually did they don't remember it anyway, since we don't remember our prenatal existence

therefore sexism is bad, mkey

>>2276588
C'mon, /lit/,

Can /lit/ bequeath unto me some /lit/ related wallpapers? I've had the same one for months.

Pic unrelated.

>>1817696
Holy shit you're actually searching for pictures of babies just for reaction images, just for this thread. Look at the effort you're putting into this. You really want to prove people wrong so badly? Jesus.

As I said: pedantic ego. Superiority complex. You cannot help but reply. Look at all these posts! You're really spoiling us.