/lit/ - Literature

>>23227927
>well akctually in my head this imaginary scenario would totally play out like this...
have some fuckin dignity, holy shit

>>22387384

>>21417423
this is quite simply objectively incorrect. Dostoevsky felt sorrow for the material conditions of the poor. He was also dissatisfied with the tsars regime and the Russian elite for obvious reasons. He attended socialist meetings in his life and read all of their books, but remained highly skeptical of the various doctrines and possibilities and dynamics of leftist ideology

What he was for certain was a Russian Christian, deeply attached to Russian identity, and a Slavophile. if you want to fit him in a box, it would probably be as an ardent nationalist (of the more traditional revolutionary understanding of the term) with a specifically ethnology-religious christian spin. by all accounts he was largely considered a reactionary back then and today by "Progressives" and leftists, just has his writing is also often subversive towards hardline Conservative circles who uphold more aristocratic and neo-aristocratic ideals and shit on the poor both back then and today.

>>19478539
lmao sperging out about the retarded general again because everyone turned on you when you for trying to make your own threads and attacking people over the dumbest shit. you are genuinely deranged

>>17245139
>t. someone who probably has little education in philosophy or any of the sciences including mathematics and logic.
To any anons reading this who think like this >>17245139 retard, please don't.
Books have almost always been used for knowledge. Please try to balance what you read and always try to prioritize learning over mere entertainment.